Larry Rohter has an important article in today's New York Times about torture under Brazil's 21 year military dictatorship and how little the country has done to address the questions of responsibility and justice in this area.
What spurred this was the discovery and publication of a pair of photographs of Vladimir Herzog, a television journalist in São Paulo, who died in military custody. The article does get one issue slightly wrong. It states that Herzog was "summoned for questioning at intelligence headquarters" in São Paulo, but in fact had been advised that he was being sought and voluntarily went to the authorities.
The reaction to Herzog's death was largely one of outrage and rejection of the official version: that Herzog had committed suicide. Students at the University of São Paulo went on strike and the Bar Association issued a statement charging the government with torture. Forty-two bishops in São Paulo signed a letter condemning the government violence. Cardinal Evaristo Arns, in an act that can only be described as supremely brave, put together and conducted a joint Catholic-Jewish (Herzog was a Yugoslavian Jewish immigrant) memorial service.
So what is the military's response to this nearly thirty years later?
Asked to comment on the photographs, published on Oct. 16, the army at first responded defiantly. It issued a declaration warning against "petty revenge-taking" and defending the violations of human rights that occurred under the military dictatorship as the necessary response to Communist provocations.
"The measures taken by legally constituted forces were a legitimate response to the violence of those who rejected dialogue and opted for radicalism," the statement said. The army acted "in response to a public clamor" for a hard line against political subversives, the statement said.
This response was received rather poorly.
That argument has proved extremely unpopular, especially to the many members of the current government who were jailed, tortured or exiled by the military government. Mr. da Silva, a former labor leader and political prisoner, was reported to be livid, and the army commander, Gen. Francisco de Albuquerque, was called to the presidential palace for a dressing-down early this week.
The army was required to issue a second statement, saying it "laments" Mr. Herzog's death and acknowledging "the lack of a profound internal discussion" about human rights among troops. "I understand that the manner in which this matter was addressed was not appropriate," General de Albuquerque said in the note, adding that the views the army initially expressed were "out of line with the current historical moment."
This is disturbing. Brazil had the longest running continuous military dictatorship of the Southern Cone countries in the 1960's, 70's and 80's, and it may have made the least progress in facing up to the past. Brazil did not have the disappearances and extrajudicial executions to the same extent that Chile and Argentina did, but torture was widespread and institutionalized.
The Argentine military is acknowledging its role in the 1970's. Chile's defense minister, until recently was the daughter of a military officer who had been tortured by Pinochet's goons. So what are the consequences of Brazil's failure to deal with this past? Widespread torture in the Rio de Janeiro State Police and prison system. A culture of impunity among law enforcement officials. There's also this:
In interviews this week, the military intelligence agent who supplied the photographs, José Alves Firmino, has also raised eyebrows by saying that military intelligence continued clandestinely to spy on left-wing parties and politicians, unions and social movements long after military rule ended. He said that during the mid-1990's he even monitored Mr. da Silva's activities, offering a photograph of himself with the future president as proof.
If respect for human rights and civilian authority isn't being taught at the Brazil's equivalent to West Point, The Agulhas Negras Military Academy in Resende, Rio de Janeiro, then it really needs to be. For, as Firmino "described his career in military intelligence. 'I spied, I stole, I received orders to kill,' he said in one. 'In short, I was a criminal.'"
So are those who gave you your orders.
Recent Comments