"Longtime U.S. diplomat Richard C. Holbrooke, whose relentless prodding and deft maneuvering yielded the 1995 Dayton peace accords that ended the war in Bosnia - a success he hoped to repeat as President Obama's chief envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan - died Monday in Washington of complications from surgery to repair a torn aorta. He was 69...
"As Mr. Holbrooke was sedated for surgery, family members said, his final words were to his Pakistani surgeon: 'You've got to stop this war in Afghanistan.' " (From Mr. Holbrooke's Washington Post Obit.)
Richard Holbrooke, RIP
Instead of asking his doctor while taking his last breath he should have used his, er, influence in Washington.
No tears:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/15/richard_holbrooke_dies_at_69_remembering
Posted by: pablo | December 15, 2010 at 09:29 PM
I have no idea regarding the circumstances or intent of this man's "last words" as published in news accounts, but I wouldn't take them as a personal plea to his doctor. Reports are that Holbrooke was very concerned that the strategy in place (which I have supported, as full disclosure) was succeeding.
Posted by: reg | December 15, 2010 at 10:16 PM
Perhaps the physician can do what the Obama administration won't.
Posted by: pablo | December 15, 2010 at 10:35 PM
Reg
Succeeding. If that is so, perhaps you'll point me to your support. I still haven't found a frank admission of what the objectives are...except perhaps from the PNAC.
Karzai "very serious" on ending air raids: official http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE54A12420090511
And not only are the multiplied 3 times lately Predator strikes unpopular, mercenaries aren't in good odour either
Karzai Said What?
http://motherjones.com/politics/2009/11/karzai-contractor-ban-obama-afghanistan
Shall I start digging into things like Depleted Uranium munitions to show that there is only one likely result of the current program - a complete wasteland ?
Posted by: opit | December 15, 2010 at 10:40 PM
Did you even read what I wrote ? Seems not.
Posted by: reg | December 15, 2010 at 11:59 PM
Holbrooke was a quite character, no doubt about it - and he could be quite effective, as witness the Dayton Accords.
On AfPak, I have the impression from "Obama's Wars" that with so many other strong personalities involved (Biden, Clinton, Petraeus, etc.) he was a guy rather in search of a mission; he hadn't found how to fit in so as to make a real impression on policy. TNR's Peter Bergen has his own take on Woodward's book, but if you're into the AfPak issue, it's an interesting read...
Posted by: Tambopaxi | December 17, 2010 at 04:21 AM